|
|





Design or Accident? |
by Jon Rettig A young man stated to me, "If I can see proof of God's existence then I will accept it." It certainly is reasonable to expect to see evidence of God's existence if He truly is the creator of this |
world. The Bible declares that the reality of God's existence and power is the obvious conclusion drawn from an observation of the physical world. For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse: Romans 1:20 Why is this conclusion evident? First of all, because of the law of cause and effect. The universe is not capable of bringing itself into existence, therefore it must have a sufficient antecedent cause. In other words, the cause of the universe must precede the universe and be sufficient to explain its size and design. Such reasoning is not the product of an overly fanciful imagination but of a very appropriate rational deduction based on a principle which any scientist would admit to - the law of cause and effect. Of course, one could assume that the universe itself is eternal. But there is a great problem with that view in that it goes against the second law of thermodynamics. "According to this law, the direction of spontaneous change in isolated systems is toward maximum disorder." (1) The sun, which loses four million tons of mass per second through nuclear fusion, provides an excellent example of this law. This downward trend necessarily infers an original beginning with high-level energy and order (low-entropy state), not only of he sun but of the entire universe. (2) "The Second Law [of Thermodynamics] requires the universe to have had beginning." (3) Unless one wants to deny the second law of thermodynamics, one has to accept that the universe is an "effect," therefore it must have had a cause. Another important consideration is the tremendously intricate design of the universe. "The innumerable and marvelous structures and systems of the cosmos, and their intricate adaptation to each other constitute a vast complex of intelligible order for which creative forethought and design can be the only rational explanation." (4) One of the most compelling examples of this "intelligible order" is the replicating mechanism of living cells - DNA. Proteins are manufactured through a complex coding system involving the DNA molecules. Proteins do not form themselves from mere chemical and physical forces, rather, they are assembled by a predetermined pattern communicated through the order of the base components in DNA. "We now know that at the heart of life is a language, a code, a set of instructions." (5) The implications of this are quite powerful and awesome. "Evidently nature can no longer be seen as matter and energy alone. … A third component is needed for any explanation of the world that claims to be complete. … Nature must be interpreted as matter, energy, and information." (6) The most appropriate analogy to genetic coding is human language. Written human language is more than just combinations of letters formed into words, sentences, paragraphs, and stories. Why does "m-a-n" communicate what we recognize to be as a "man"? It is because intelligent beings have chosen that particular combination to mean what it does. The meaning is not inherent in the word. Intelligent origin, not random chance, is likewise necessary to explain the informational transfer system associated with DNA. "…and the unique informational properties of DNA are best explained by an author, a creator of life." (7) There are certainly multitudes of other examples that could be given of the intricate complexities of the universe, all of which give convincing evidence that the world was designed and not brought about through random chance. An atheistic view of the world is not "natural," it must be indoctrinated. No matter how complex a cloak it is draped in, this view is devoid of a rational basis in the facts of nature. But why do many persist in the belief that the world and life are just chemical and biological phenomena? Perhaps it is because to accept the existence of God, of necessity makes us accountable to Him as created, living beings. Many, therefore, would rather just admire the wonders of creation while ignoring One who created it so they can avoid the moral responsibility that accepting God would cause them. Much better and more reasonable would be to accept the fact that; Genesis 1:1 - "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth." References: 1. World Book Encyclopedia, 1995, Volume 6, p. 328 2. Whitcomb, John C., The Early Earth, Baker Book House, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1981, p. 55. 3. Morris, Dr. Henry M., Scientific Creationism, Master Books, El Cajon, California, 1974, p. 26. 4. Morris, Dr. Henry M., The Remarkable Birth of Planet Earth, Creation-Life Publishers, San Diego, California, 1978, p. 11. 5. Pearcy, Nancy R. and Thaxton, Charles B., The Soul of Science, Crossway Books, Wheaton, Illinois, 1994, p. 227. 6. Campbell, Jeremy, Grammatical Man: Information, Entropy, Language, and Life, New York, New York, Simon and Schuster, 1982, p. 16. 7. The Soul of Science, p. 243. |